I do. If you’ve added a couple of toolbars and changed a few settings, it’s probably fine for you. But I think it’s been effectively broken for significantly customised setups ever since Autodesk “improved” it by introducing the CUI mechanism in AutoCAD 2006. It’s undocumented and whenever I’ve tried it, unreliable. I ran some polls on it a couple of years ago which had few responses. What do you think now?
If you’re unhappy with migration, don’t just vent here. Autodesk now wants to hear from you. Here’s the announcement:
Dear AutoCAD User!
AutoCAD Product Design & Usability Team is looking for participants for the study.
Topic: focus on Migration process, Migration tool and results of migration.
Our Goal
To gain the most complete understanding about problems and requests AutoCAD users may have while migrating their settings and customization from a previous release of AutoCAD.
Who Should Participate?
We are looking for individual contributors or CAD managers with small number of seats (less than 5- either standalone or multi-seat standalone) with unsatisfying experience using Migration tool to migrate settings from a previous version of AutoCAD.
How the Study will be Conducted?
We will schedule ~1 h interview session with you (remotely) and discuss your experience with migration, results you expected, outcome you’ve got.
When?
We are planning research between May 27 and June 2, 2010.
How To Sign Up?
Please submit qualification data and indicate your availability here:
I’m a bit concerned about the restriction of this study to individual users and CAD managers with a handful of users, as I would have thought CAD managers with significant numbers of users would be the least satisfied group, and the group with the greatest need for a working Migration system. However, as with other such Autodesk research, I encourage your participation.
I really like these invitations Steve. Have made myself availabe for these sessions by responding to a few of these and as yet have not ‘been chosen’.
I wonder why that would be? 😉 Are those ‘accepted’ for participation, carefully selected to ensure they are customers who are ‘on the same page’ as Autodesk?
Autodesk channel management has gone from brilliant to retarded with their transparent rip-off subscription plans.